U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Democrats have shut down the government. Department of Justice websites are not currently regularly updated. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

DNA - A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook Inventory

Defense Logic

Home  |  Glossary  |  Resources  |  Help  |  Contact Us  |  Course Map
 

The defense logic states that by comparing the suspect's DNA profile to many thousands or millions in a database, the statistical probability of finding a match is much greater than a one-on-one comparison. While this claim is statistically correct, the answer is that the "cold hit" is only used as probable cause to obtain a reference sample from the suspect. Once a reference sample is typed, it is the profile from that sample which is compared to the evidence sample. Thus, the probability calculation performed is in fact a one-on-one comparison of the suspect's reference sample. [DNA Database Searches and the Legal Consumption of Scientific Evidence, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 931, 1999, and; Statistical and Population Genetics Issues Affecting the Evaluation of the Frequency of Occurrence of DNA Profiles Calculated From Pertinent Population Databases, Forensic Science Communications, July 2000, Vol. 2 #3.]

Another reason the defense argument is faulty is that the question the jury is entitled to be informed on is the same in a cold hit case as in any other case: how rare or common is the DNA profile within the population? This is a question of legal relevancy and not a question of proper scientific procedure or methodology.

Back Forward