Archival Notice
This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.
Home | Glossary | Resources | Help | Course Map
Before taking on an assignment, the expert should consider prior testimony tendered in trial or deposition. The expert should review all publications on the same or similar subjects as well, such as articles in books, technical journals and reviews.
The expert should compare the contemplated investigation, conclusion and testimony with the cross-examination effect that might occur if the expert has written or testified in a similar case that is contrary to the position being tendered. One of the major areas of deposition examination is to determine the extent of prior inconsistent writings or testimony by the expert. Opposing counsel will spend considerable hours and great effort in uncovering inconsistent prior testimony or writings, which can then be used to impeach or discredit the expert as a testifying witness.
Additional Online Courses
- What Every First Responding Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Collecting DNA Evidence at Property Crime Scenes
- DNA – A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- DNA Amplification
- Population Genetics and Statistics
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Firearms Examiner Training
- Forensic DNA Education for Law Enforcement Decisionmakers
- What Every Investigator and Evidence Technician Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony
- Español for Law Enforcement
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts