The question courts will have to resolve is whether a DNA identification, or use of the names John or Jane Doe coupled with facts describing the criminal event, will "put the adversary on notice to defend within a specified period of time."

At least one State appellate court has approved a DNA identification "John Doe" warrant for statute of limitation purposes. ²²

The Wisconsin decision in Dabney ²², suggests that such a warrant would be made stronger if it also included, where available, a physical description of the person suspected of committing a crime.

Back Forward