Archival Notice
This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.
If an admissibility hearing is requested regarding one of the commercial STR kits in general use, prosecutors should look to the successes of their colleagues for guidance [Utah v. Butterfield, 27 P.3d 1133; 2001 UT 59; 425 Utah Adv. Rep. 8 (Utah 2001); Colorado v. Shreck, 22 P.3d 68; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1995 (Colo. 2001)]. Experts are available from a wide range of scientific fields that use these STR kits daily (e.g., histocompatibility/ immunogenetics in bone marrow transplants, and post-conviction exonerations). It can be clearly shown that these kits have general acceptance throughout the scientific community (Frye). Likewise, it is clear that such kits are scientifically valid and reliable and serve as the basis for life and death decisions outside of the use of forensic sciences (Daubert).
Additional Online Courses
- What Every First Responding Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Collecting DNA Evidence at Property Crime Scenes
- DNA – A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- DNA Amplification
- Population Genetics and Statistics
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Firearms Examiner Training
- Forensic DNA Education for Law Enforcement Decisionmakers
- What Every Investigator and Evidence Technician Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony
- Español for Law Enforcement
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts