Home | Glossary | Resources | Help | Contact Us | Course Map
Archival Notice
This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.
In these cases in which biological evidence was collected and still exists, DNA results excluding the petitioner may exonerate him or her as the perpetrator of the crime.*
Example: Petitioner was convicted of the rape of a sexually inactive child. While vaginal swabs were taken and preserved, no previous DNA testing was conducted. DNA testing that excludes the petitioner as the source of the sperm will establish actual innocence. Note that in such a case, the victim's DNA - normally also present on the vaginal swab - operates as a control that confirms that the correct sample is being tested. In addition, the victim's age and sexual status at the time of the offense ensure that the swab contains only biological material related to the crime.
*Be aware of complex issues that arise in mixture cases.
Additional Online Courses
- What Every First Responding Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Collecting DNA Evidence at Property Crime Scenes
- DNA – A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- DNA Amplification
- Population Genetics and Statistics
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Firearms Examiner Training
- Forensic DNA Education for Law Enforcement Decisionmakers
- What Every Investigator and Evidence Technician Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony
- Español for Law Enforcement
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts