AFTE Theory of Identification

In 1985, the Criteria for Identification Committee formalized the AFTE Theory of Identification as it Relates to Toolmarks. The theory articulates three principles that provide the conceptual basis for comparing toolmarks for the purpose of identifying them as having a common source.

The three principles of the AFTE Theory of Identification as it Relates to Toolmarks:

1. The theory of identification as it pertains to toolmarks enables opinions of common origin to be made when the unique surface contours of two toolmarks are in sufficient agreement.
2. This sufficient agreement is related to the significant duplication of random toolmarks as evidenced by the correspondence of a pattern or combination of patterns of surface contours. Significance is determined by the comparative examination of two or more sets of surface contour patterns comprised of individual peaks, ridges, and furrows. Specifically, the relative height or depth, width, curvature, and spatial relationship of the individual peaks. Ridges and furrows within one set of surface contours are defined and compared to the corresponding features in the second set of contours. Agreement is significant when it exceeds the best agreement demonstrated between two toolmarks known to have been produced by different tools and is consistent with agreement demonstrated by toolmarks known to have been produced by the same tool. The statement that sufficient agreement exists between two toolmarks means that the likelihood another tool could have made the mark can be considered a practical impossibility.
3. The current interpretation of individualization/identification is subjective in nature, founded on scientific principles and based on the examiners training and experience.

Sufficient Agreement and Best Known Nonmatch

The second of the three principles of the AFTE Theory of Identification indicates that the degree of correspondence which must be exceeded to constitute sufficient agreement for an identification is the best known nonmatch (by each individual examiner) to have been produced by different tools. Ideally, the examiner would gain experience in this during their initial training period rather than when they begin to perform actual examinations on their own.

The third principle of the AFTE Theory of Identification indicates that, although founded on the scientific method and reproducibility of results, the interpretation is subjective in nature. It is the policy of most laboratories that a second qualified examiner verify the findings of the first examiner.

Ultimately, sufficient agreement is the product of the examiners personal training, skills, and experience in

• recognizing corresponding patterns of matching striations,
• recognizing corresponding patterns within impressed toolmarks,
• determining the best known non-match in their personal experience,
• comparing striated and impressed toolmarks.

It is incumbent on each examiner to rely on their training and experience to identify and to be able to articulate the process used to determine sufficient agreement and best known nonmatch.

Back Forward