Criminal justice evaluation
Testing and Evaluating Body Worn Video Technology in the Los Angeles Police Department
Studying the Impact of Video Analytics for Pre, Live and Post Event Analysis on Outcomes of Criminal Justice
Digital Evidence and the U.S. Criminal Justice System - Identifying Technology and Other Needs to More Effectively Acquire and Utilize Digital Evidence
Impact of System Wide Drug Testing in Multnomah County, Oregon
Establishing a National Institute of Justice Research, Test, and Evaluation Center:Continuation
A Process and Impact Evaluation of The Veterans Moving Forward Program: Best Practices, Outcomes, and Cost-Effectiveness
University of Massachusetts Lowell 3D Contactless Fingerprint Scanner: Technology Evaluation (Version 2)
Training Evaluation Model: Evaluating and Improving Criminal Justice Training
Marion County Fostering Attachment Treatment Court Follow-Up Process and Outcome Evaluation Report
Evaluation of the Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification Program, Final Report
Evaluating the Effect of Holistic Indigent Defense Services on Case Outcomes: A Natural Experiment in the Bronx
Establishing a National Criminal Justice Technology Research, Test and Evaluation Center
No More Rights Without Remedies: An Impact Evaluation of the National Crime Victim Law Institute's Victims' Rights Clinics, Final Technical Report
No More Rights Without Remedies: An Impact Evaluation of the National Crime Victim Law Institute's Victims' Rights Clinics, Executive Summary
Multi-Site Assessment of Five Court-Focused Elder Abuse Initiatives, Executive Summary
L-3 GS&ES' Proposal Submission for Supplemental Funding to Support the Continuation of the Communications Technology Center of Excellence (COE), Award Number NIJ-2010-IJ-CX-K023.
Sensor, Surveillance, and Biometrics Technologies Center of Excellence
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy