Criminal justice evaluation
Digital Evidence and the U.S. Criminal Justice System - Identifying Technology and Other Needs to More Effectively Acquire and Utilize Digital Evidence
Impact of System Wide Drug Testing in Multnomah County, Oregon
Establishing a National Institute of Justice Research, Test, and Evaluation Center:Continuation
A Process and Impact Evaluation of The Veterans Moving Forward Program: Best Practices, Outcomes, and Cost-Effectiveness
University of Massachusetts Lowell 3D Contactless Fingerprint Scanner: Technology Evaluation (Version 2)
Establishing a National Criminal Justice Technology Research, Test and Evaluation Center
Evaluating the Effect of Holistic Indigent Defense Services on Case Outcomes: A Natural Experiment in the Bronx
Multi-Site Assessment of Five Court-Focused Elder Abuse Initiatives, Executive Summary
L-3 GS&ES' Proposal Submission for Supplemental Funding to Support the Continuation of the Communications Technology Center of Excellence (COE), Award Number NIJ-2010-IJ-CX-K023.
Sensor, Surveillance, and Biometrics Technologies Center of Excellence
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy