The evaluation examined DTE's distinct components: the Pretrial Release and Supervision Program and the postsentence program for probationers and parolees. The results indicate that probation and parole officers believed drug testing has provided them with an effective case management tool; however, analysis of subsequent arrest records showed no significant decrease in rearrest rates associated with participation in the DTE program. Use of DTE during pretrial release did not result in fewer arrests among defendants assigned to drug testing than among defendants not referred to testing. Differences in the way corrections officers responded to offenders who violated drug testing requirements also did not affect recidivism. According to the study, the absence of measurable effects on participants' behavior may have resulted from the DTE program's scarcity of resources: the lack of capacity for penalizing violations of testing conditions and the limited availability of treatment slots.
Similar Publications
- Testing Gender-Differentiated Models of the Mechanisms Linking Polyvictimization and Youth Offending: Numbing and callousness versus dissociation and borderline traits
- Examining the Multifaceted Impacts of Drug Decriminalization on Public Safety, Law Enforcement, and Prosecutorial Discretion
- Identifying Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing the Say Something Anonymous Reporting System in Miami-Dade County, USA: A Qualitative Study