The evaluation examined DTE's distinct components: the Pretrial Release and Supervision Program and the postsentence program for probationers and parolees. The results indicate that probation and parole officers believed drug testing has provided them with an effective case management tool; however, analysis of subsequent arrest records showed no significant decrease in rearrest rates associated with participation in the DTE program. Use of DTE during pretrial release did not result in fewer arrests among defendants assigned to drug testing than among defendants not referred to testing. Differences in the way corrections officers responded to offenders who violated drug testing requirements also did not affect recidivism. According to the study, the absence of measurable effects on participants' behavior may have resulted from the DTE program's scarcity of resources: the lack of capacity for penalizing violations of testing conditions and the limited availability of treatment slots.
Similar Publications
- Second Chance Act (SCA) Grant Program Evaluation: Interim Report on Program Implementation in Three SCA Sites
- Risk-Based Services, Reoffending, and Rethinking Service Approaches for Justice-Involved Youth
- Expanding on the factor structure and construct validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a general correctional sample