Archival Notice
This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.
Home | Glossary | Resources | Help | Course Map
Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(b)(4), only experts retained for trial and trial preparation can be subjects of discovery. If the expert is retained only as a consultant but not in anticipation of trial testimony, then his work on the case is probably not discoverable.
In one case, the court considered four factors in determining whether the expert was a retained witness for trial purposes, or an informally consulted expert:
- The manner in which the consultation was initiated.
- The nature, type and extent of information and material provided to the expert.
- The duration and intensity of the consultation relationship.
- The terms of the consultation, such as items of payment and like considerations.
(Sources: Mueller, p. 17, citing Ager v. Jane C. Stormont Hospital and Training School for Nurses, 622 F.2d 496-501, 502 (10th Cir. 1980); see also Olson v. Accessory Controls and Equipment Corp., 735 A.2d 881 (1999), judgment aff'd, 757 A.2d 14, 27 (2000), wherein the court, relying partly on a retention letter between an attorney and an environmental consulting company, held that the consulting company's report was privileged because the report was clearly created to facilitate the sharing of legal advice.)
There is also an exception in the discovery rules involving the testimony of an expert who is retained in anticipation of litigation but is not expected to testify at trial. Normally, that witness's files and opinions are not subject to the usual rules of discovery.
If a party can show that exceptional circumstances exist — that the information being sought is not otherwise available — some courts will carve out an exception and allow discovery for a non-testifying expert. In such cases, the opposition usually has to show the following:
- The expert has information about an item that has been destroyed or changed.
- The party seeking discovery cannot otherwise obtain an expert.
- Few experts in this area or discipline exist.
- All other available experts have been retained by the opposition.
(Source: Mueller, p. 18.)
Additional Online Courses
- What Every First Responding Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Collecting DNA Evidence at Property Crime Scenes
- DNA – A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- DNA Amplification
- Population Genetics and Statistics
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Firearms Examiner Training
- Forensic DNA Education for Law Enforcement Decisionmakers
- What Every Investigator and Evidence Technician Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony
- Español for Law Enforcement
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts