Tasers
Quantum of Force: The Consequences of Counting Routine Conducted Energy Weapon Punctures as Injuries
Taser Blunt Probe Dart-To-Heart Distance Causing Ventricular Fibrillation in Pigs
Estimating the probability that the Taser® directly causes human ventricular fibrillation
Estimating neuromuscular stimulation within the human torso with Taser® stimulus
Distribution of Anti-Felon Identification Tags
Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology: A Nine-Step Strategy for Successful Deployment
TASER Exposure and Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Valid Miranda Waivers and the Timing of Police Custodial Interrogations
Examining Cognitive Functioning Following TASER Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of Less-Lethal Weapons on Injuries in Police Use-of-Force Events
Medical Panel Issues Interim Findings on Stun Gun Safety
A TASER Conducted Electrical Weapon With Cardiac Biomonitoring Capability: Proof of Concept and Initial Human Trial
Conducted Energy Devices: Policies on Use Evolve To Reflect Research and Field Deployment Experience
NIJ Journal Issue No. 261
NIJ Journal Issue No. 268
Are CEDs Safe and Effective?
Thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the United States have adopted conducted energy devices (CEDs) as a safe method to subdue individuals, but are these devices really safe? What policies should agencies adopt to ensure the proper use of this technology? This NIJ Conference Panel discusses the physiological effects of electrical current in the human body caused by CEDs, as well as how this technology can reduce injuries to officers and suspects when appropriate policies and training are followed.