Forensic sciences
Test Results for Digital Data Acquisition Tool: ASR Data SMART version 2010-11-03
National Institute of Justice Annual Report 2013
Evaluating the Los Angeles County Elder Abuse Forensic Center
Tracking Movements with Isotopes
National Institute of Justice Annual Report 2014
Regioisomer Differentiation for Substances Using GC-IR
Improved Detection of Synthetic Cathinones in Forensic Toxicology Samples: Thermal Degradation and Analytical Considerations
Forensic Death Investigation Symposium, June 7-9, 2010
Forensic Optical Topography Working Group Meeting, March 17-18, 2015
Forensic Technology Center of Excellence: Validation and Evaluation of Magneto-Optical Imaging Technology for Recovering Obliterated Serial Numbers in Firearms
A Sexual Assault Kit Partnership
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy
Fighting Crime With Science
Landscape Study of DNA Mixture Interpretation Software
Recreational Research: Analyzing 'Designer Drugs' at Miami’s Premier Electronic Music Festival
Development of a SNP Assay Panel for Ancestral Origin Inference and Individuals Somatic Traits
Support for Forensic Science Research: Improving the Scientific Role of the National Institute of Justice
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
Brian Cerchiai discusses a NIJ-supported a study conducted by the Miami-Dade Police Department on the accuracy of fingerprint examiners. The study found that fingerprint examiners make extremely few errors. Even when examiners did not get an independent second opinion about their decisions, they were remarkably accurate. But when decisions were verified by an independent reviewers, examiners had a 0% false positive, or incorrect identification, rate and a 3% false negative, or missed identification, rate.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy