Crime type
Anthropological Methods for DNA Analysis of the Missing and Unidentified Children Located at the Former Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys in Florida
Combining Efforts to Identify the Missing: A United States/Mexico DNA Project
Empirical Assessment of Domestic Radicalization
Interview with Gary Ackerman, Director for Special Projects, National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, University of Maryland
Mr. Ackerman is conducting an empirical assessment of domestic radicalization, with an emphasis on the process of radicalization. In this interview, Ackerman explains how he is using large empirical analysis and small scale life study analysis to discover which factors might cause an individual to make the leap from illegal terrorist behavior to violent terrorist behavior.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
Effect of Forensic Evidence on Criminal Justice Case Processing
Legitimacy, Fear and Collective Efficacy in Crime Hot Spots: Assessing the Impacts of Broken Windows Policing Strategies on Citizen Attitudes
Survey and Evaluation of Online Crime Mapping Companies
Effects of Data Quality on Predictive Hotspot Mapping
NIJ FY 12 Using DNA Technology to Identify the Missing
Using DNA Technology to Identify theMissing
DNA analysis of unidentified remains to assist in identifying missing persons.
Identifying the Missing of Minnesota: A Comprehensive Approach
Risk Terrain Modeling Experiment: A Multi-Jurisdictional Place-Based Test of an Environmental Risk-Based Patrol Deployment Strategy
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy