NCJ Number
243685
Date Published
January 2013
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This study examined the role and impact of forensic evidence on case-processing outcomes in a sample of 4,205 criminal cases drawn from 5 U.S. jurisdictions.
Abstract
Regression analyses demonstrated that forensic evidence played a consistent and robust role in case-processing decisions. Still, the influence of forensic evidence is time- and examination-dependent: the collection of crime scene evidence was predictive of arrest, and the examination of evidence was predictive of referral for charges, as well as of charges being filed, conviction at trial, and sentence length. The only decision outcome in which forensic evidence did not have a general effect was with regard to guilty plea arrangements. More studies are needed on the filtering of forensic evidence in different crime categories, from the crime scene to its use by investigators, prosecutors, and fact-finders, and to identify factors that shape decisions to collect evidence, submit it to laboratories, and request examinations. Abstract published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons.
Date Published: January 1, 2013
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Discussion of the FTCOE’s Guidance Document on Considerations for Photographic Documentation in Sexual Assault Cases
- An Examination of Differences in Epigenetic Methylation of Saliva Type Samples Based on Collection Method
- Is It an Accident or Abuse? Researchers Develop Predictive Models for Pediatric Head Injuries