U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites always use a .gov or .mil domain. Before sharing sensitive information online, make sure you’re on a .gov or .mil site by inspecting your browser’s address (or “location”) bar.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Student Threat Assessment as a Standard School Safety Practice: Results From a Statewide Implementation Study

NCJ Number
252084
Date Published
Author(s)
Dewey Cornell, Jennifer Maeng, Anna G. Burnette, Yuane Jia, Francis Huang, Timothy Konold, Pooja Datta, Marisa Malone, Patrick Meyer
Annotation
Since Virginia became the first state to mandate student threat assessment in its public schools in 2013, the current study examined this statewide implementation of threat assessment and analyzed how threat assessment teams distinguish serious from non-serious threats.
Abstract
Threat assessment has been widely endorsed as a school safety practice, but there is little research on its implementation. In assessing Virginia’s statewide threat assessment system, the current study analyzed 1,865 threat assessment cases reported by 785 elementary, middle, and high schools in Virginia.. Students ranged from pre-K to Grade 12 and included 74.4 percent male, 34.6 percent receiving special education services, 51.2 percent White, 30.2 percent Black, 6.8 percent Hispanic, and 2.7 percent Asian. Survey data were collected from school-based teams to measure student demographics, threat characteristics, and assessment results. Logistic regression indicated that threat assessment teams were more likely to identify a threat as serious if it was made by a student above the elementary grades (odds ratio 0.57; 95 percent lower and upper bound 0.42–0.78), a student receiving special education services (1.27; 1.00–1.60), involved battery (1.61; 1.20–2.15), homicide (1.40; 1.07–1.82), weapon possession (4.41; 2.80–6.96), or targeted an administrator (3.55; 1.73–7.30). Student race and gender were not significantly associated with a serious threat determination. The odds ratio that a student would attempt to carry out a threat classified as serious was 12.48 (5.15–30.22). These results provide new information on the nature and prevalence of threats in schools using threat assessment. They can guide further work in developing this emerging school safety practice. (Publisher abstract modified)
Date Created: November 6, 2018