Prison overcrowding
Location Tracking Systems for Community Supervision
California: A Decade of Decarceration
Remarks of James K Stewart Concerning The National Institute of Justice
Sentencing Reform in the Other Washington (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 28, P 71-136, 2001, Michael Tonry, ed. -- See NCJ-192542)
Day Reporting Center Clients Compared to Standard Probation Clients in Franklin County, PA, Final Report
Alleviating Jail Crowding - A Systems Perspective
Assessment of the Felony Case Process in Cook County, Illinois and its Impact on Jail Crowding
Special National Workshop - State Legislative Strategies for Correctional Reform - Workshop Proceeding - Criminal Justice Research Utilization Program, May 19-20, 1980
North Carolina's Determinate Sentencing Legislation
Effectiveness of Supervised Pretrial Release
Shock Incarceration and Prison Crowding In Louisiana
New Construction Methods for Correctional Facilities
Exploring Jail Construction Options
Selective Incapacitation?
Determinate Sentencing and Abolishing Parole: The Long-Term Impacts on Prisons and Crime
Using Early Release to Relieve Prison Crowding - A Dilemma in Public Policy
Impact of Prison Crowding on Male and Female Imprisonment Rates in Minnesota: A Research Note
Results of a Multisite Study of Boot Camp Prisons
Model-Based US Prison Population Projections
Effects of Determinate Sentencing on Inmate Misconduct in Prison
NIJ Journal Issue No. 268
Changing the Behavior of Drug-Involved Offenders: Supervision That Works
A small number of those who commit crimes are heavily involved in drugs commit a large portion of the crime in this country. An evaluation of a "smart supervision" effort in Hawaii that uses swift and certain sanctioning showed that individuals committing crimes who are heavily involved in drug use can indeed change their behavior when the supervision is properly implemented.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
What Works in Offender Supervision
This NIJ Conference Panel highlights findings from NIJ projects that evaluated strategies to enhance the supervision of offenders in the community. Researchers discuss the effectiveness of fair, swift and certain sanctions for high-risk probationers in the Hawaii HOPE program. Panelists also provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of electronic monitoring — including the use of GPS tracking — for medium- and high-risk offenders on supervision and upon completion of their supervision sentence.