Sentencing guidelines
Prosecution and Punishment of International Terrorist in Federal Courts: 1980-1998
Official's Reactions to Sentencing Guidelines
Unintended Consequences of Sentencing Policy: The Creation of Long-Term Healthcare Obligations
Measuring Judicial and Prosecutorial Discretion: Sex and Race Disparities in Departures From the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Inextricable Link Between Age and Criminal History in Sentencing
Charging and Plea Bargaining Practices Under Determinate Sentencing: An Investigation of the Hydraulic Displacement of Discretion
Commensurability and Crime Prevention - Evaluating Formal Sentencing Structures and Their Rationale
Workshop on Sentencing and Other Federal Case Data Analysis, July 2009
Confine the Worst and Manage the Rest: Considering a Shift in Criminal Justice Spending
Countering Technology-Facilitated Abuse: Criminal Justice Strategies for Combating Nonconsensual Pornography, Sextortion, Doxing, and Swatting
Risk and Rehabilitation: Supporting the Work of Probation Officers in the Community Reentry of Extremist Offenders
Less Prison, More Police, Less Crime: How Criminology Can Save the States from Bankruptcy
Professor Lawrence Sherman explains how policing can prevent far more crimes than prison per dollar spent. His analysis of the cost-effectiveness of prison compared to policing suggests that states can cut their total budgets for justice and reduce crime by reallocating their spending on crime: less prison, more police.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy
Crime File: Predicting Criminality
This video, in the Crime File series, portrays a panel discussion of the nature and reliability of the Federal and California parole guidelines, justification for their use as sentencing guidelines, and moral and legal issues associated with their use.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy