Search and seizure
Improving Understanding of Law Enforcement at Schools - Breakout Session, NIJ Virtual Conference on School Safety
On February 16-18, 2021, the National Institute of Justice hosted the Virtual Conference on School Safety: Bridging Research to Practice to Safeguard Our Schools. This video includes the following presentations:
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
STUDYING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE
Consent to Search and Seize: Evaluating an Innovative Youth Firearm Suppression Program
Impact of Police Culture on Traffic Stop Searches: An Analysis of Attitudes and Behavior
Debating DNA Collection
Kansas City Gun Experiment
Combating Transnational Organized Crime by Linking Multiple Large Ivory Seizures to the Same Dealer
Notes from the Field: Snapshot of the United States Indian Policing Academy
Familial DNA Searching: Issues and Answers
Familial DNA searching is the practice of creating new investigative leads in cases where DNA evidence found at the scene of a crime strongly resembles that of an existing DNA profile but is not an exact match. Panelists will explain how the technology works, provide examples of successful convictions obtained through familial searches, and discuss the various misconceptions and concerns regarding this practice.
Crime File: Exclusionary Rule
This video, in the Crime File series, presents background material on some U.S. Supreme Court decisions pertinent to the use of the exclusionary rule in sanctioning illegal police searches and seizures (Mapp v. Ohio and Shepherd v. Massachusetts); the moderator, James Q. Wilson, poses questions to Professor Yale Kamisar, University of Michigan Law School, and D. Lowell Jensen, Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, designed to probe the controversial implications of the exclusionary rule.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
Crime File: Search and Seizure
This Crime File video shows three dramatized scenarios of police search and seizure tactics are critiqued as to their legality by a panel consisting of a police officer, a U.S. attorney, and a public defender.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy