The fourth amendment leaves unanswered questions about the balance between the right to privacy and the State's interest in effective law enforcement. The courts have taken two positions on whether a warrant is a precondition of search and seizure: the first considers whether there is probable cause for the search and seizure and the reasonableness of its conduct; the other assumes that a warrantless search is unreasonable except in extraordinary circumstances. A number of U.S. Supreme Court decisions have held that warrantless searches are justified in exigent circumstances: (1) where there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed and evidence may be destroyed and (2) in cases of lawful arrest where a search is necessary to obtain evidence and protect officers from assault with a weapon. In the absence of probable cause, the court has generally held that warrantless searches must be relatively unintrusive, limited in extent, and undertaken only when police have grounds to believe that an individual in an investigative stop may be dangerous. 4 study questions and 5 references.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Examining Connections between the Police and Prosecution in Sexual Assault Case Processing: Does the Use of Exceptional Clearance Facilitate a Downstream Orientation?
- Examining Police Presence, Tactics, and Engagement as Facilitators of Informal Social Control in High-Crime Areas
- Integration of Simple Antennas to Multiband Receivers Using a Novel Multiplexer Design Methodology