Randomized controlled trials
Long Term Effects of Drug Court Participation Evidence from a 15 Year Follow up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Cognitive Behavioral Interventions for Medium- and High-Risk Juvenile Offenders: A Statewide Randomized Controlled Trial in Virginia
Partner Violence Prevention for Middle School Boys: A Dyadic Web-Based Intervention
Re-engaging Justice-Involved Youth
Substance Abuse Treatment as a Mechanism to Reduce Drug Abuse and Crime
Situational Approaches to Making Communities and Correction Institutions Safer
Process and Outcome Evaluation of the G.R.E.A.T. Program
Evaluability Assessments of the Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) Model, Cross-Site Report
Linking Theory to Practice: Testing Geospatial Predictive Policing in a Medium-Sized Police Agency
Evaluating the Impact of Probation and Parole Home Visits
Improving Hot-Spot Policing through Behavioral Interventions
Effects of a Middle School Social-Emotional Learning Program on Teen Dating Violence, Sexual Violence, and Substance Use in High School
Long-Term Impact of a Positive Youth Development Program on Dating Violence Outcomes During the Transition to Adulthood
A Brief Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Dating Aggression Perpetration
Intimate Partner Violence and Custody Decisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Outcomes from Family Court, Shuttle Mediation, or Videoconferencing Mediation
Official Crime Rates of Participants in Trials of the Nurse-Family Partnership
Additional Support for the Evaluation of the BJA Second Chance Act Adult Demonstration Projects
Translating ''Near Repeat'' Theory into a Geospatial Police Strategy: A Randomized Experiment testing a Theoretically-Informed Strategy for Preventing Residential Burglary
Official Crime Rates of Participants in Trials of the Nurse-Family Partnership
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy