Evaluation
Level of confidence in elemental analysis by LIBS
The Evaluation of Laser Diode Thermal Desorption ((LDTD) for High Throughput Analysis of Controlled Substances and Toxicology in Forensic Sciences
Beyond Arrest: The Portland, Oregon Domestic Violence Experiment, Final Report
Monitoring High-Risk Sex Offenders With GPS Technology: An Evaluation of the California Supervision Program, Final Report
GPS Monitoring Technologies and Domestic Violence: An Evaluation Study
Evaluating the Implementation of a Family-Focused Prevention Program: Effectiveness of SAFE Children
Survey of Officers on the Use and Care of Body Armor
Factors that Impact the Effectiveness of Body Armor
DNA Testing: Techniques and Results in the Los Angeles Study
Sidebar to the article Solving Sexual Assaults: Finding Answers Through Research
Sexual Assault Kit Backlog Study
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy