Young Offenders: What Happens and What Should Happen

• NCJ Number: 242653
• Author(s): Philip Bulman
• Date Published: February 2014
• Length: 3 pages
• Publication Series: OJJDP Justice Research Series
• Grant Number(s): 2008-IJ-CX-K402
• Agencies: NIJ; OJJDP
• Publication Type: Report (Summary); Legislation/Policy Analysis
• Award: Study Group on Violence and Serious Offending in Late Adolescence and Young Adulthood

Annotation

This bulletin examines policies that impact young offenders who cross over from the juvenile to the criminal justice system, with a focus on juvenile delinquents ages 15-17 who are candidates for transitioning into the criminal justice system and young adults age 18-24 who are already in the criminal justice system.

Abstract

The 20th-century shift to punitive policies toward offenders in these two age groups is first reviewed. An increase in the number of homicides committed by adolescents and young adults in the late 1980s resulted in all States passing laws to make their juvenile justice systems more punitive, and these new laws led to more juveniles being tried and sentenced to adult prisons. These changes may have been counter-productive, however, as recent studies have shown that juvenile justice system services and supervision are more effective than confinement in reducing antisocial behavior. Criminal justice policy for adolescents and young adults must recognize what research has determined regarding child and adolescent brain development, i.e., that there are developmental differences in the human brain, which is not fully mature until early adulthood. Evidence from research on the effectiveness of criminal justice policies and the findings of developmental neuroscience require criminal justice policy reforms. First, consider raising the minimum age for criminal court to 21 or 24. Second, consider creating special correctional facilities for young adult offenders, with tailored services such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, drug treatment, mentoring, educational and vocational training, and work release programs. Third, consider a "youth discount" for young offenders that decreases the severity of penalties. Fourth, conduct risk and needs assessments of young offenders to guide intervention. Fifth, use reentry services that include therapy, drug treatment, and educational programs.