Since sharp-force trauma research lacks agreement on reported error rates for correctly identifying toolmark characteristics on bone and cartilage, the current study provides error rates for determining blade class (serrated, partially serrated, non-serrated) and type of edge bevel (left, right, even).
Three analysts examined cuts to a wax medium, cartilage, and bone using two types of microscopes. The observers also examined impressions taken from the wax medium and the cartilage. Overall, a total of 504 observations were performed. Serrated blades were distinguishable from non-serrated blades due to their patterned striations. Some difficulties were encountered in distinguishing serrated and partially serrated blades; however, when these groups were considered together as one classification type (serrated), classification accuracy improved from 79 percent to 96 percent. Classification accuracy for edge bevel was 65 percent. Error rates were similar when comparing direct observation of the cut marks versus indirect observation (impressions). The type of microscope used did not affect error rates. (publisher abstract modified)
- Physics and Statistical Models for Physical Match Analysis Utilizing 3D Microscopy of Fracture Surfaces
- Error and bias in race and ethnicity descriptions in medical examiner records in New Mexico: Consequences for understanding mortality among Hispanic/Latinos
- The Stress of Motherhood and Intimate Partner Violence during Emerging Adulthood