Motivated by the development of a large macromorphoscopic database-which will potentially utilize data collected in 2002-quantification of observer error, the impact of technological improvements in macromorphoscopic trait data collection and observer experience is necessary. To maximize comparisons between the two samples, ten macromorphoscopic traits were assessed. Results revealed three patterns of error relating to observer experience, the introduction of new technologies, and error inherent in the method. Overall, this study found the effect of error on macromorphoscopic trait analysis could be predicted and did not significantly impact their utility. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments
- Two-Stage Approach for the Inference of the Source of High-Dimension and Complex Chemical Data in Forensic Science
- Machine Aided Speaker Identification - Phase One - Semiautomatic Speaker Identification System - Final Report of Phase One Research