This document reports on listening sessions with juvenile court judges that explored the application and outcomes of policy changes to juvenile justice system practices in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, with the central goal of determining which practices should be continued, and how.
This report describes research activities that aimed to answer three questions: how U.S. juvenile justice systems responded to the Covid-19 pandemic and how policies change regarding transfers between and releases from juvenile residential facilities; how the different policy responses are associated with youth and public safety outcomes; and what resources are needed to sustain those policies that were associated with positive outcomes. The authors describe the setting, participants, and focus of their research activities, and provide a detailed breakdown of their findings. They highlight judges’ concerns about the impact of remote hearings on equity and fairness for the juveniles, and that judges commented that while remote hearings may prevent the spread of Covid-19, they make it harder to assess factors related to youth safety and wellbeing.
Similar Publications
- Family Doesn't Have to be Mom and Dad': An Exploration of the Meaning of Family for Care-experienced Young People
- Longitudinal Cohort Study: Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Individual/Clinical Risk Factor on Recidivism Among Mississippi Justice-Involved Youth
- Scaling up Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) Framework in Rural Settings Through the Idaho Rural Implementation Model