Sanctions
More Precise Evaluation of the Effects of Sanctions Executive Report
More Precise Evaluation of the Effects of Sanctions
Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity - A Reexamination
Sentencing in the Misdemeanor Courts - The Choice of Sanctions
Codebook for SPSS Dataset: Experiments in Sanctions
Notes on Methodological Issues in Criminal Justice Sanctions
Registry of Randomized Criminal Justice Experiments in Sanctions
Comparative Impacts of Juvenile and Criminal Court Sanctions on Adolescent Offenders
Registry of Randomized Criminal Justice Experiments in Sanctions: A User's Guide to the Machine-Readable Files and Documentation and Original Codebook
Towards a Prosecutorial and Defense Production Function Constructing a Measure of Output
Weighted Dispositions - Adding Quality to Performance Measurement
Appropriateness of Sanctions - Minnesota Community Corrections Act Evaluation
The price of a sex offense conviction: A comparative analysis of the costs of community supervision
A Natural Experiment to Test the Effect of Sanction Certainty and Celerity on Substance-Impaired Driving: North Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Program
Misdemeanor Courts and the Choice of Sanctions - A Comparative View
Standardizing Parole Violation Sanctions
Examining the Effects of Community-Based Sanctions on Offender Recidivism
Strategies for Effective Parole Supervision: Ohio's Graduated Sanction Guidelines
Imposition of Economic Sanctions in Philadelphia: Costs, Fines, and Restitution
Value of the Post-Conviction Polygraph: The Importance of Sanctions
Graduated Sanctions: Stepping Into Accountable Systems and Offenders
Crime Deterrence, and Rational Choice
Preventing and Controlling Corporate Crime: The Dual Role of Corporate Boards and Legal Sanctions
What Works in Offender Supervision - Panel at the 2009 NIJ Conference
This NIJ Conference Panel highlights findings from NIJ projects that evaluated strategies to enhance the supervision of offenders in the community. Researchers discuss the effectiveness of fair, swift and certain sanctions for high-risk probationers in the Hawaii HOPE program. Panelists also provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of electronic monitoring — including the use of GPS tracking — for medium- and high-risk offenders on supervision and upon completion of their supervision sentence.