The study focus was on the effectiveness of sanctions in reducing recidivism and reincarceration. The sample included 1,200 adolescent felony offenders who had been arrested for robbery and burglary during the 1981-1982 and 1986-1987 periods. Counties and cases in both New Jersey and New York were matched on several variables to control for the effects of social context on sentencing and recidivism. Results showed that little was gained by processing adolescent crimes in criminal court. Sanctions were more certain, but no less severe in the juvenile court compared to the criminal court with significant period effects reflecting exogenous factors that affected both courts. Recidivism rates were lower for adolescents sanctioned in juvenile court. Juveniles were rearrested less often, at a lower rate, and after a longer crime-free interval. Adolescents sanctioned in criminal court had higher crime rates, suggesting that the criminalization of juvenile delinquency may actually have iatrogenic effects with respect to recidivism. Policy implications of the study findings are that special jurisprudence for adolescent crimes and a separate jurisdiction for juvenile offenders are needed and that the current trajectory of juvenile court reform should continue. Appendixes provide additional information on New Jersey and New York statutes for robbery and burglary, juvenile dispositions, and offense classification. 92 references and 14 tables
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Insights into turning points from the perspective of young people with out-of-home care experience: events, impact and facilitators of change
- Polyvictimization, Emotion Dysregulation, Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Behavioral Health Problems Among Justice-Involved Youth: a Latent Class Analysis
- Social Bonds Across Immigrant Generations: Bonding to School and Examining the Relevance of Assimilation