Randomized controlled trials
Substance Abuse Treatment as a Mechanism to Reduce Drug Abuse and Crime
Process and Outcome Evaluation of the G.R.E.A.T. Program
Evaluating the Impact of Probation and Parole Home Visits
Linking Theory to Practice: Testing Geospatial Predictive Policing in a Medium-Sized Police Agency
Improving Hot-Spot Policing through Behavioral Interventions
Long-Term Impact of a Positive Youth Development Program on Dating Violence Outcomes During the Transition to Adulthood
Effects of a Middle School Social-Emotional Learning Program on Teen Dating Violence, Sexual Violence, and Substance Use in High School
Intimate Partner Violence and Custody Decisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Outcomes from Family Court, Shuttle Mediation, or Videoconferencing Mediation
A Brief Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Dating Aggression Perpetration
Official Crime Rates of Participants in Trials of the Nurse-Family Partnership
Additional Support for the Evaluation of the BJA Second Chance Act Adult Demonstration Projects
Translating ''Near Repeat'' Theory into a Geospatial Police Strategy: A Randomized Experiment testing a Theoretically-Informed Strategy for Preventing Residential Burglary
Official Crime Rates of Participants in Trials of the Nurse-Family Partnership
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy