Peer reviews
Florida State University and Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Researcher-Practitioner Partnership Proposal to enhance evidence-based juvenile justice research and policy.
Native American Studies Postdoctoral Fellowship
Detection of Gunshot Residue in Blowfly Larvae, Decomposing Porcine Tissue, and Porcine Bone Using Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
Citrate Content of Bone: A Potential Measure of Post Mortem Interval
Therapeutic Change, Length of Stay and Recidivism for Incarcerated Juvenile Offenders
The Analysis of Trace Forensic Evidence Using Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry: Differentiating Fibers
Genome-Wide Forensic DNA Analysis
National Institute of Justice Fellowship: Violence Against Indian Women Research Program
Field Detection of Drugs and Explosives by SPME-IMS
Results and Status of an Ongoing Forensic Cheminformatic, Spectral Database
Ancestry/Phenotype SNP Analysis & Integration with Established Forensic Markers
Standing Review Panels
The Standing Review Panels represent NIJ's continuing commitment to the scientific integrity at the heart of its mission. Any science agency awarding external research grants must rely on a well-founded peer review process. By adopting Standing Review Panels, NIJ is following a model for peer review that has been extensively tested and is now relied on by most federal science agencies, including the National Institutes...
Statistical Evaluation of Torn and Cut Duct Tape Physical End Matching
Research Validity and Integrity
Scientific & Research Integrity Policy
The DOJ Scientific Integrity Policy underscores the validity and objectivity of NIJ’s scientific endeavors.
The Institute provides objective and independent knowledge and tools to enhance safety and promote justice. NIJ follows widely accepted scientific processes and procedures to help ensure the validity and integrity of our research. This page describes: