Latent fingerprints
Testing the Accuracy and Reliability of Palmar Friction Ridge Comparisons: A Black Box Study
Security Crystals: NIR-To-NIR Upconverting Nanoparticles for Fingerprint Identification and DNA Extraction
Nanoparticles for Chemical Imaging of Latent Fingerprint
ACEware Latent Fingerprint Identification Research and Software Development
El Libro de Referencia de las Huellas Dactilares
Forensic Biology & DNA
High-throughput DNA Sequencing of Environmentally Insulted Latent and Partial Bloody Fingerprints After Visualization with the Nanoscale Columnar-Thin-Film Technique
Chemical Imaging of Latent Fingerprint for Forensic Evidence
Evaluation of The Use of A Contactless, Three-Dimensional Scanner for Collecting Postmortem Fingerprints from Unidentified Human Remains
Novel Quantitative Microscopy of Wet-Powdered Latent Fingermarks of Different Ages
Occurrence and Utility of Latent Print Correspondences that are Insufficient for Identification
Novel concept for fingerprint analysis
Evaluation of an Emerging Automated Searching Technology to Improve the Efficiency and Reliability of Latent Print Comparisons
Nanoparticles for Chemical Imaging of Latent Fingerprint
New concept for fingerprint analysis: bioaffinity-based systems utilizing amino acids
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
ESDA (R)-Lite Collection of DNA From Latent Fingerprints on Documents
Error Rates for Latent Fingerprinting as a Function of Visual Complexity and Cognitive Difficulty
Impression, Pattern & Trace Evidence
TECHBeat, January 2016
Latent Fingerprint Interoperability Survey: A National Study of Automated Fingerprint Information Systems (AFIS) Maintained by Law Enforcement Agencies - Summary Reporting of Data Provided by Responding Agencies
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
Brian Cerchiai discusses a NIJ-supported a study conducted by the Miami-Dade Police Department on the accuracy of fingerprint examiners. The study found that fingerprint examiners make extremely few errors. Even when examiners did not get an independent second opinion about their decisions, they were remarkably accurate. But when decisions were verified by an independent reviewers, examiners had a 0% false positive, or incorrect identification, rate and a 3% false negative, or missed identification, rate.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy