Forensic sciences
Test Results for Digital Data Acquisition Tool: VOOM HardCopy 3P - Firmware Version 2-04
National Institute of Justice Annual Report 2013
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: CelleBrite UFED 1.1.8.6 - Report Manager 1.8.3 UFED Physical Analyzer 2.3.0
Tracking Movements with Isotopes
Evaluating the Los Angeles County Elder Abuse Forensic Center
National Institute of Justice Annual Report 2014
Regioisomer Differentiation for Substances Using GC-IR
Improved Detection of Synthetic Cathinones in Forensic Toxicology Samples: Thermal Degradation and Analytical Considerations
Forensic Death Investigation Symposium, June 7-9, 2010
Forensic Technology Center of Excellence: Validation and Evaluation of Magneto-Optical Imaging Technology for Recovering Obliterated Serial Numbers in Firearms
Forensic Optical Topography Working Group Meeting, March 17-18, 2015
A Sexual Assault Kit Partnership
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
TECHBeat, September/October 2015
Landscape Study of DNA Mixture Interpretation Software
Development of a SNP Assay Panel for Ancestral Origin Inference and Individuals Somatic Traits
Support for Forensic Science Research: Improving the Scientific Role of the National Institute of Justice
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
Brian Cerchiai discusses a NIJ-supported a study conducted by the Miami-Dade Police Department on the accuracy of fingerprint examiners. The study found that fingerprint examiners make extremely few errors. Even when examiners did not get an independent second opinion about their decisions, they were remarkably accurate. But when decisions were verified by an independent reviewers, examiners had a 0% false positive, or incorrect identification, rate and a 3% false negative, or missed identification, rate.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy