Forensic biology
Comparative Evaluation of Massively Parallel Sequencing STR kits with the Emphasis on Mixture Deconvolution Utilizing Probabilistic Genotyping.
Evaluating the Impact of Dropout and Genotyping Error on SNP-Based Kinship Analysis With Forensic Samples
Proteins, possibly human, found in World War II concentration camp artifact
Technical Modifications for the Application of the Total Difference Method for Frontal Sinus Comparison
A multipurpose panel of microhaplotypes for use with STR markers in casework
Microbiota succession throughout life from the cradle to the grave
The effects of burning on isotope ratio values in modern bone: Importance of experimental design for forensic applications
Inter-laboratory variation in interpretation of DNA mixtures
Guiding proposition setting in forensic DNA interpretation
2022 National Forensic Science Week FTCoE Student Research Poster Session
Ancient Genomes Indicate Population Replacement in Early Neolithic Britain
Microbial succession in human rib skeletal remains and fly-human microbial transfer during decomposition
Bridging Disciplines: Applications of Forensic Science and Industrial Hemp
What's Possible with Rapid DNA Technology?
NIJ scientist Tracey Johnson joins science writer Sarah Michaud in this episode. They discuss Rapid DNA technology, and Tracey explains the complexities of this technology – its pitfalls and its possibilities.
Reading and Resources from NIJ:
The Link Between the SAMFE and Police Perceptions of Victim Credibility
Match statistics for sequence-based alleles in profiles from forensic PCR-mps kits
A predictive model for vertebrate bone identification from collagen using proteomic mass spectrometry
Probing menstrual bloodstain aging with fluorescence spectroscopy
Reducing noise and stutter in short tandem repeat loci with unique molecular identifiers
Resolution of mitochondrial DNA mixtures using a probe capture next generation sequencing system and phylogenetic-based software
Hair Root Staining – What Can Hematoxylin Do for Your Laboratory?
Interlaboratory Comparison of SpermX and Conventional Differential Extractions