Evidence analysis and processing
Interpreting Forensic DNA Profiling evidence without specifying the number of contributors
More Straightforward Derivation of the LR for a Database Search
Communicating Forensic Science
Down the Road: Testing Evidence in Sexual Assaults
National Missing and Unidentified Persons System
TECHBeat, January 2016
Trace DNA From Fingernails: Increasing the Success Rate of Widely Collected Forensic Evidence
New Orleans Sexual Assault Evidence Project: Results and Recommendations
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: Lantern v2.3
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: Secure View 3v3.8.0
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: Device Seizure v5.0 build 4582.15907
Five Things Law Enforcement Executives Can Do To Make a Difference
Wrongful Conviction: What Does Science Tell Us About the Causes?
Tracking Movements With Isotopes
NIJ-supported researchers are using oxygen and strontium isotopes to help law enforcement identify victims.
Fighting Crime With Science
Recreational Research: Analyzing 'Designer Drugs' at Miami’s Premier Electronic Music Festival
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
Brian Cerchiai discusses a NIJ-supported a study conducted by the Miami-Dade Police Department on the accuracy of fingerprint examiners. The study found that fingerprint examiners make extremely few errors. Even when examiners did not get an independent second opinion about their decisions, they were remarkably accurate. But when decisions were verified by an independent reviewers, examiners had a 0% false positive, or incorrect identification, rate and a 3% false negative, or missed identification, rate.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy