Evaluation Costs
Moving Closer to Home Before Release: Evaluating a Step-Down Strategy to Transfer Adults in State Prisons to Local Correctional Systems
Optimizing the Use of Video Technology to Improve Criminal Justice Outcomes
Telemental Health Services for Reaching Rural Victims of Crime: Phase 2
Evaluation of Culture and Climate Effects in the Virginia Department of Corrections Cognitive Communities
Enhancing Vocational Training in Corrections: A Type 1 Hybrid Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol for Evaluating Virtual Reality Job Interview Training Among Returning Citizens Preparing for Community Re-entry
NIJ Multisite Impact and Cost-Efficiency Evaluation of Veterans Treatment Courts
Formative Evaluation and Evaluability Assessment of a Family Justice Center
A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial of an Enhanced Field Training Officer Program: An Analysis of Administrative Outcomes and Community Interactions
NIJ Multisite Impact and Cost-Efficiency Evaluation of Veterans Treatment Courts
Ensemble Subspace Segmentation Under Blockwise Constraints
Evaluability Assessment of the Weinberg Center for Elder Justice's Elder Abuse Shelter Services
Day Reporting Centers in New Jersey: No Evidence of Reduced Recidivism
PARAPROFESSIONALS IN PROBATION - A SYNTHESIS OF MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND OUTCOME STUDIES
Experimental Test of Rehabilitative Field Work for Moderate-to-High Risk Adults
A Law Enforcement Pathway to Treatment: A Multi-Site Evaluation of Self-Referral Deflection Programs
Benefit-Cost Analysis for Crime Policy
How do we decide how to allocate criminal justice resources in a way that minimizes the social harms from both crime and policy efforts to control crime? How, for that matter, do we decide how much to spend on the criminal justice system and crime control generally, versus other pressing needs? These questions are at the heart of benefit-cost analysis.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
Research and Evaluation on Domestic Radicalization to Violent Extremism
This webinar will provide details and guidance for potential applicants to help build knowledge and evidence related to strategies for effective prevention and intervention of domestic radicalization and violent extremism in the United States. The overall purpose of this program will be to reduce the likelihood that acts of violent extremism occur. This funding will support replication and evaluation of existing programs as well as development and evaluation of programs where none currently exist.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
What Works in Offender Supervision
This NIJ Conference Panel highlights findings from NIJ projects that evaluated strategies to enhance the supervision of offenders in the community. Researchers discuss the effectiveness of fair, swift and certain sanctions for high-risk probationers in the Hawaii HOPE program. Panelists also provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of electronic monitoring — including the use of GPS tracking — for medium- and high-risk offenders on supervision and upon completion of their supervision sentence.