Why Is the Victimization of Young Latino Adults Higher in New Areas of Settlement?

• NCJ Number: 253450
• Author(s): Min Xie; Karen Heimer; James P. Lynch; Michael Planty
• Date Published: 2018
• Length: 34 pages
• Grant Number(s): 2012-R2-CX-0017
• Agencies: NIJ-Sponsored
• Publication Type: Research (Applied/Empirical); Report (Study/Research); Report (Grant Sponsored); Program/Project Description
• Award: The Changing Geography of American Immigration and its Effects on Violent Victimization: Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey

Annotation

This study used multilevel data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) to identify factors that account for differences in risk of violent victimization among young Latino adults in new and traditional settlement areas.

Abstract

Area-identified NCVS data (2008-2012) were linked with census tract data from the decennial census and American Community Survey to study individual and community contributions to the risk of violent victimization. The study analyzed total violence and violence specific to offense types and victim-offender relationship. The analyses performed adjusted for the complex survey design. Young Latino adults in new settlement areas had higher victimization rates than their counterparts in traditional areas for total violence and for the majority of violence types studied. Holding constant individual and other contextual factors, Latino population density was a key neighborhood characteristic that explained the observed area differences in victimization, yielding evidence for the hypothesis that co-ethnic support in a community helps protect young Latino adults and contributes to differences in victimization across areas. Also, there was evidence that the protective role of Latino population density was stronger for violence that involved non-strangers than it was for violence that involved strangers. Moreover, the study found that the concentration of Latino immigrants, which indicated the neighborhood potential for immigrant revitalization, was another neighborhood factor that protected young Latino adults in both new and traditional settlement areas; however, there is some but limited evidence that the neighborhood-revitalizing role of immigration might be smaller in some contexts (such as some new areas outside central cities), possibly because those areas are heterogeneous in their ability to promote the integration of immigrants. Thus, this analysis of the NCVS shows the importance of neighborhood factors for the risk of violence among young Latino adults. It provides evidence consistent with co-ethnic support and immigrant revitalization theories. The findings also suggest that the effects of those neighborhood factors may be contingent upon violence type and the context in which they occur. These findings help us understand the difference in the safety of young Latino adults in new and traditional areas. (publisher abstract modified)