NCJ Number
234243
Journal
Violence Against Women Volume: 17 Issue: 3 Dated: March 2011 Pages: 309-321
Date Published
March 2011
Length
13 pages
Annotation
This article describes the gap that exists between methods used among researchers outside of the study of violence against women.
Abstract
The present article describes the gap that exists between traditional data analysis techniques and more sophisticated methods that tend to be used more commonly among researchers outside of the study of violence against women. The authors briefly characterize growth models and person-centered analyses and describe the growing body of work in violence research that has applied these methods. Through an example from the authors own application of one of these techniqueslatent class growth analysisthe authors highlight the ways that violence against women researchers may benefit from applying these more sophisticated methods to their own data, both past and present. (Published Abstract)
Date Published: March 1, 2011
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Improving Identification, Prevalence Estimation, and Earlier Intervention for Victims of Labor and Sex Trafficking: A Lessons Learned Report
- The Role of Social-Emotional Factors in Bystanders' Judgments and Responses to Peer Aggression and Following Retaliation in Adolescence
- A Low-Cost, Simplified Platform of Interchangeable, Ambient Ionization Sources for Rapid, Forensic Evidence Screening on Portable Mass Spectrometric Instrumentation