This paper discusses the methodology and outcomes of two studies aimed at determining how much one cognitive distortion among police officers was associated with problematic orientations about use of force and citizen interactions.
The literature on cognitive distortions offers insight on why we continue to face reform challenges regarding police use-of-force- and citizen interaction-related outcomes. The authors used two studies of police officers to determine the extent to which one cognitive distortion (dichotomous thinking) was associated with problematic orientations about use of force and citizen interactions. In Study 1, they found that dichotomous thinking was associated with weaker support for de-escalation, procedural justice, and maintaining self-control during hypothetical citizen interactions. Dichotomous thinking also was associated with more support for force-related misconduct. Study 2 showed that officers who engaged in dichotomous thinking were more likely to perceive an immediate and serious threat from watching suspects in body-worn camera videos. Also, they were more likely to believe suspects had greater ability, opportunity, and intent to cause harm. The authors discuss the practical implications of these findings for policing and police reform. (Published Abstract Provided).
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Trauma Behind the Keyboard: Exploring Disparities in Child Sexual Abuse Material Exposure and Mental Health Factors among Police Investigators and Forensic Examiners – A Network Analysis
- A Self-assessment Tool for Helping Identify Police Burnout Among Investigators of Child Sexual Abuse Material
- “We Need to Not Fear You”: Essential Factors Identified by Sworn Officers and Civilian Staff for Implementation and Expansion of a Co-Response Program