This paper discusses the methodology and outcomes of two studies aimed at determining how much one cognitive distortion among police officers was associated with problematic orientations about use of force and citizen interactions.
The literature on cognitive distortions offers insight on why we continue to face reform challenges regarding police use-of-force- and citizen interaction-related outcomes. The authors used two studies of police officers to determine the extent to which one cognitive distortion (dichotomous thinking) was associated with problematic orientations about use of force and citizen interactions. In Study 1, they found that dichotomous thinking was associated with weaker support for de-escalation, procedural justice, and maintaining self-control during hypothetical citizen interactions. Dichotomous thinking also was associated with more support for force-related misconduct. Study 2 showed that officers who engaged in dichotomous thinking were more likely to perceive an immediate and serious threat from watching suspects in body-worn camera videos. Also, they were more likely to believe suspects had greater ability, opportunity, and intent to cause harm. The authors discuss the practical implications of these findings for policing and police reform. (Published Abstract Provided).
Downloads
Similar Publications
- A data set of bloodstain patterns for teaching and research in bloodstain pattern analysis: Impact beating spatters
- Estimation of Population-specific Values of Theta for PowerPlex Y23 Profiles
- Improving and Evaluating Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Investigation of Fatalities Involving Suspected Head Trauma