The authors of this paper propose using the fractal nature of fracture surface topography and their transition to non-self-affine properties to define an appropriate comparison scale; they also report on efforts to develop supporting statistical methods for forensic fracture matching through three-dimensional topological imaging of fracture surface details.
The complex jagged trajectory of fractured surfaces of two pieces of forensic evidence is used to recognize a “match” by using comparative microscopy and tactile pattern analysis. The material intrinsic properties and microstructures, as well as the exposure history of external forces on a fragment of forensic evidence have the premise of uniqueness at a relevant microscopic length scale (about 2–3 grains for cleavage fracture), wherein the statistics of the fracture surface become non-self-affine. The authors utilize these unique features to quantitatively describe the microscopic aspects of fracture surfaces for forensic comparisons, employing spectral analysis of the topography mapped by three-dimensional microscopy. Multivariate statistical learning tools are used to classify articles and result in near-perfect identification of a “match” and “non-match” among candidate forensic specimens. The framework has the potential for forensic application across a broad range of fractured materials and toolmarks, of diverse texture and mechanical properties. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Should Survey Likert Scales Include Neutral Response Categories?
- Restrictive housing for prison rule violators: Specific deterrence or defiance?
- Assessing the Relationship Between Treatment Quality, Matching and Dosage and Juvenile Justice Outcomes Among Youth With Co-Occurring Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders