Focus is on a comparison of the static logit model with a time-dependent hazard model. These models are applied to data from a 2-year followup study of male inmates released from prison in North Carolina and a 10-year study of criminal justice contacts following parole among subjects from a California Youth Authority institution. Results of the analyses clearly support recidivism as a process in which chance plays an essential role. The variables and models used here assigned most subjects to failure probabilities that lie in a middle range, resulting in substantial prediction error. While the logit model was found to perform somewhat better in assigning individual probabilities of failure within some fixed period of time, hazard models generally possess practical and analytical advantages. Additional statistical data are appended. 26 tables and 23 references.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- People, Places, and Things: How Female Ex-Prisoners Negotiate Their Neighborhood Context
- Community Supervision Officers' Perceptions of Risk and Desistance Among Clients on Probation or Parole A Case Study in Georgia
- Community Court Grows in Brooklyn: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center, Final Report