Using a mixed-methods design, this study examined intimate partner surveillance among a diverse sample of intimate partner abuse (IPA) survivors (n = 246), including women of Mexican (n = 83), Korean (n = 50), Vietnamese (n = 49), and European descent (n = 64).
Most survivors (57 percent) described surveillance in either survey or interview; inductive thematic analysis revealed seven forms of surveillance. Finally, two-step cluster analysis identified two patterns of victimization most clearly differentiated by surveillance, but ethnic group differences in rates and patterns of abuse did not emerge. Implications for both clinicians and researchers are discussed. 97 references (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Analyzing and interpreting deoxyribonucleic acid from multiple donors using a forensically relevant single-cell strategy
- The Experience of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Lens on Variability in Compliance
- From Childhood Maltreatment to Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: a Prospective Longitudinal Examination of the Roles of Executive Functioning and Self-esteem