This article presents findings from interviews with school principals, assistant principals, discipline coordinators, police, and district leaders, in order to determine how schools address the implementation of two competing school safety philosophies - one that implements "get-tough" disciplinary responses to student misbehavior, and a supportive policy that addresses the causes of student problem behaviors. Implications for theory, research, and policy are discussed.
U.S. schools are increasingly faced with the challenge of navigating two seemingly contradictory approaches to school safety. On one hand, they attempt to make schools safer by using get-tough, punishment-oriented policies. On the other hand, schools promote support-oriented policies that aim to address the root causes of students' behavioral issues. Despite significant advances in research on school safety, little is known about how schools balance the implementation of these two approaches. Implications for therapy, research, and policy are discussed. 84 references (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Prediction of Blood Back Spatter From a Gunshot in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
- Testing Gender-Differentiated Models of the Mechanisms Linking Polyvictimization and Youth Offending: Numbing and callousness versus dissociation and borderline traits
- Profiles of Principal Stress and Coping: Concurrent and Prospective Correlates