The BJS data have the potential to help support democratic policing, provide baseline data on use of force for comparative statistical reporting and research purposes, and enable strong local checks on police abuses, provided their validity and reliability can be demonstrated. Findings from the current study indicate that the BJS data suffer from serious measurement flaws, do not provide a valid and reliable basis for comparative statistical reporting and research purposes, and should not be relied on for purposes of litigation. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments
- Raman spectroscopic signature of vaginal fluid and its potential application in forensic body fluid identification
- Training police for procedural justice: An evaluation of officer attitudes, citizen attitudes, and police-citizen interactions