The Law was widely advertised with proponents claiming that it would introduce greater equity in sentences, ensure certainty of punishment, and decrease violent crime in the state. We examine the processing of these Gun Law cases in Detroit Recorders Court, as well as the effects of the law on crime, and find that most of the goals of the Law's proponents are not met. Notwithstanding a rigid prosecutorial policy which prohibited plea bargaining in these gun cases, alternative mechanisms developed to mitigate the Law's effects and, in most instances, to preserve the 'going rate' for various crime categories. Similarly, using an interrupted time-series model, we are unable to uncover effects of the law, or the associated publicity campaign, on violent crime. (Publisher abstract)
Mandatory Sentencing and Firearms Violence - Evaluating an Alternative to Gun Control
NCJ Number
88667
Journal
Law and Society Review Volume: 17 Issue: 2 Dated: (1983) Pages: 287-318
Date Published
1983
Length
32 pages
Annotation
Michigan's Felony Firearm Statute (Gun Law) imposed a two-year mandatory add-on sentence for defendants convicted of possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony.
Abstract
Date Published: January 1, 1983