For each of the three clustering procedures, 100-percent coverage resulted in less than optimal accuracy in recovering underlying populations from the computer-generated mixtures. For all three methods, the accuracy of clustering solutions was substantially increased by leaving 11-25 percent of the subjects unclassified. Results suggest that accuracy of clustering solutions can be increased in the range of 55-85-percent coverage. For all the methods tested, increasing coverage about 85 percent had deleterious effects on clustering accuracy. Graphs, tables, and 75 references are included. Technical data are appended. (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Topics
Cluster analysisSimilar Publications
- Untangling the Influences of Unmodeled Evolutionary Processes on Phylogenetic Signal in a Forensically Important HIV-1 Transmission Cluster
- Development of a Novel Five Dye Insertion/Deletion (INDEL) Panel for Ancestry Determination
- Notes from the Field: Cluster of Severe Illness from Neptune’s Fix Tianeptine Linked to Synthetic Cannabinoids — New Jersey, June–November 2023