This paper challenges the widely shared view that the United States and international frameworks regulating terrorist finance and money laundering (AML/CFT) is productive and effective.
Through a careful look at the evidence regarding the formal and informal fund transfer systems, this paper shows that security, crime control, and economic policy objectives are systematically frustrated by ill-conceived and misapplied rules. U.S. federal and state regulations in particular illustrate how unrealistic, unaffordable, and counter-productive are current arrangements. The paper concludes with some suggestions about how to reverse the ongoing fact-free policymaking process. (Published abstract provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Research at the College of Police and Security Studies Ljubljana, Slovenia 1996-2001: Book of Research Abstracts
- Predicting Crime Through Incarceration: The Impact of Rates of Prison Cycling on Rates of Crime in Communities
- Impact Evaluation of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994: Final Report