Probabilistic genotyping typically proceeds by first deconvoluting a mixture into separate components and then computing a likelihood ratio for a potential contributor. The typical range of likelihood ratios for contributors and unrelated profiles depends, to a large extent, on how well the mixture is resolved. This in turn depends on the quality and complexity of the sample. Some samples are highly discriminatory while others are likely to yield only inconclusive results. Knowing the power of discrimination is helpful when deciding on whether to proceed with investigating a case or to do potential rework and for deciding on database inclusion. The current article describes the results of several case scenarios, exploring questions such as: Is the profile's minor contributor likely to yield a large likelihood ratio?, Is it feasible to find a donor among a large database of unrelated profiles?, or What is the probability that a brother of a true donor yields a large likelihood ratio?. The efficiency and speed of the method was demonstrated for several examples. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Comparative Evaluation of Genotyping Technologies for Investigative Genetic Genealogy in Sexual Assault Casework
- Development and Evaluation of a Nontargeted Electrochemical Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (EC-SERS) Screening Method Applied to Authentic Forensic Seized Drug Casework Samples
- Discrimination Between Human and Animal Blood Using Raman Spectroscopy and a Self-Reference Algorithm for Forensic Purposes: Method Expansion and Validation