Violence against Women
Violent Victimization Among Males and Economic Conditions: The Vulnerability of Race and Ethnic Minorities
Describing Intimate Partner Stalking Over Time: An Effort to Inform Victim-Centered Service Provision
Longitudinal Association Between Teen Sexting and Sexual Behavior
Predictors of Rape Myth Acceptance Among Male Clients of Female Street Prostitutes
Predicting Sexual Assault Prosecution Outcomes: The Rule of Medical Forensic Evidence Collected by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners
Police Presence, Isolation, and Sexual Assault Prosecution
Women's Experiences of Victimization and Survival
Impact of Offenders Leaving the Scene on the Police Decision to Arrest in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence
Economic Costs of Partner Violence and the Cost-Benefit of Civil Protective Orders
Digital Forms of Dating Violence: What School Nurses Need To Know
Association Between Sexting and Sexual Coercion Among Female Adolescents
Sexual Violence Against Alaska Tribal Women: Village Public Safety Officers Having Some Impact
Video Games Designed To Address Sexual Assault on Campus
Post-Coital DNA Recovery in Minority Proxy Couples
NIJ Journal Issue No. 281
Minnesota Sexual Assault Kit Research Project
Campus Sexual Assault Responses (CSAR): Informing Trauma-Informed Policies, Protocols, and Training
Improving the Forensic Documentation of Injuries through Alternate Light: A Researcher-Practitioner Partnership
Wrongful Convictions: The Latest Scientific Research & Implications for Law Enforcement
What does science tell us about case factors that can lead to a wrongful conviction? Dr. Jon Gould of American University will discuss the findings of the first large-scale empirical study that has identified ten statistically significant factors that distinguish a wrongful conviction from a "near miss." (A "near miss" is a case in which an innocent defendant was acquitted or had charges dismissed before trial). Following Dr. Gould's presentation, Mr. John R.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy
Violent Repeat Victimization: Prospects and Challenges for Research and Practice
Research tells us that a relatively small fraction of individuals experience a large proportion of violent victimizations. Thus, focusing on reducing repeat victimization might have a large impact on total rates of violence. However, research also tells us that most violent crime victims do not experience more than one incident during a six-month or one-year time period. As a result, special policies to prevent repeat violence may not be cost-effective for most victims.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy