Intensive probation
HOPE is a good thing? Probationer perceptions of and experiences with the honest opportunity probation with enforcement demonstration field experiment
Executive Summary of Rand's Study, 'Granting Felons Probation Public Risks and Alternatives'
Outcome Findings From the HOPE Demonstration Field Experiment: Is Swift, Certain, and Fair an Effective Supervision Strategy?
Intermediate Sanctions
Estimates of Drug Use in Intensive Supervision Probationers: Results From a Pilot Study
NYC Probation on Track
National Evaluation of the Correctional Options Demonstration Program
Evaluating Intensive Supervision Probation/Parole (ISP) for Drug Offenders
Decide Your Time: Testing Deterrence Theory's Certainty and Celerity Effects on Substance-Using Probationers
NIJ Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships: Evaluation of Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies for Domestic Violence, Final Report
Even a Little Bit Helps: An Implementation and Experimental Evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for High-Risk Probationers
Day Reporting Centers in New Jersey: No Evidence of Reduced Recidivism
Contingent Intermediate Sentences: New Jersey's Intensive Supervision Program
An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Intensive Supervision on the Recidivism of High-Risk Probationers
What Works in Offender Supervision
This NIJ Conference Panel highlights findings from NIJ projects that evaluated strategies to enhance the supervision of offenders in the community. Researchers discuss the effectiveness of fair, swift and certain sanctions for high-risk probationers in the Hawaii HOPE program. Panelists also provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of electronic monitoring — including the use of GPS tracking — for medium- and high-risk offenders on supervision and upon completion of their supervision sentence.