Probation and parole professionals argue that supervision outcomes would improve if caseloads were reduced below commonly achieved standards. Criminal justice researchers are skeptical because random assignment and strong observation studies have failed to show that criminal recidivism decreases with reductions in caseload sizes. One explanation is that caseload reduction by itself is insufficient; supervision must also be allotted and distributed to make the best use of supervision resources, a cornerstone of evidence-based practice (EBP). This study uses a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to test the null hypothesis that reduced caseload in an agency using EBP has no effect on criminal recidivism. The conclusions are that reduced caseloads in this context probably reduce criminal recidivism and probably do not increase revocations for technical violations. Tables, figures, notes, and references (Published Abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Contemplative Practices and the Movement Toward a More Just Criminal Legal System
- Predicting Pretrial Misconduct with Drug Tests of Arrestees: Evidence from Eight Settings, Research Report
- IMPLEMENTATION OF QUANTITATIVE DECISION AIDS IN THE OKLAHOMA PROBATION AND PAROLE SYSTEMS, AND ATTITUDES TOWARD THEM