Evidence analysis and processing
National Missing and Unidentified Persons System
Latent Prints
DNA Discipline
Firearms
Digital Multimedia Evidence
Toxicology Discipline
Controlled Substances
Developing Improved Means to Collect Digital Evidence Program
With this solicitation, NIJ seeks proposals for funding to conduct research and technology development leading to the introduction into practice of new and innovative tools to: -Process large-scale computer networks for digital evidence in a forensically sound manner that preserves the probative value of the evidence that the computer network may contain; or -Process mobile devices voluntarily surrendered to law enforcement by witnesses or victims...
Trace DNA From Fingernails: Increasing the Success Rate of Widely Collected Forensic Evidence
Evaluating Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Programs
Liaison to the National Institute of Justice
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: Lantern v2.3
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: Secure View 3v3.8.0
Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: Device Seizure v5.0 build 4582.15907
Five Things Law Enforcement Executives Can Do To Make a Difference
Regioisomer Differentiation for Substances Using GC-IR
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
Brian Cerchiai discusses a NIJ-supported a study conducted by the Miami-Dade Police Department on the accuracy of fingerprint examiners. The study found that fingerprint examiners make extremely few errors. Even when examiners did not get an independent second opinion about their decisions, they were remarkably accurate. But when decisions were verified by an independent reviewers, examiners had a 0% false positive, or incorrect identification, rate and a 3% false negative, or missed identification, rate.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy